Rate this:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

This is the sort of article that deserves a followup from the media. Monkton makes claims that can be proved one way or the other. If the media is so focused on “balance” they should be checking out his claims and presenting their findings.
monckton always leaves an interview with at least one claim unchallenged (and one that would require verification). Such is the claim that John Abraham lied to scientists about what Monckton said.
No, he didn’t.
He just sent Monckton’s presentation to various scientists to peer review. Which they did.